Skip to main content

The Local AI Visibility Index

Orthodontics across 6 US markets

We measured every Orthodontics practice Google Maps returns in 6 markets — 186 businesses in total — then asked 5 AI answer engines the same 10 patient questions in each one and recorded who got named.

Practices
186
Markets
6
Questions
10 per market
Engines
5
Measured
July 2026

67.7%

of the best-reviewed Orthodontics practices across 6 markets were named by no AI answer engine at all.

Finding 01

How often do the best-ranked local businesses show up in AI answers?

The businesses ranked highest on Google Maps still show up in only 24.4% of AI answers. Measured across 186 orthodontists in 6 markets: across the best-ranked 10% by map position, an AI engine named them in 24.4% of the answers about their own category.

Ranking well clearly helps. It is also clearly not the thing that decides it — most of the best-ranked businesses across these 6 markets still never came up. And this is an average of markets that do not agree with each other: rank counted for more in the smaller markets we measured than in the larger ones.

Google Maps rank vs getting named — all 6 markets combined
Where they rank on Google MapsNamed by AIShare
The 1st third — best ranked on Maps27 of 6243.5%
The middle third4 of 626.5%
The bottom third2 of 623.2%

Finding 02

How much of the AI answers do a handful of businesses take?

In the average local market, three businesses take 84.1% of everything AI answer engines say. Measured across 186 orthodontists in 6 markets: the three most-named businesses in each market got 84.1% of all the mentions, and everyone else split what was left.

Finding 03

Are the best-reviewed local businesses named by AI answer engines?

67.7% of the best-reviewed local businesses are never named by an AI answer engine. Measured across 186 orthodontists in 6 markets: among the top half by Google rank, star rating and review count combined, 67.7% show up in Google Maps but were named in none of the AI answers about their own category.

Finding 04

Do Google reviews decide whether AI names a business?

Google reviews do not decide whether AI answer engines name a business. Measured across 186 orthodontists in 6 markets: neither the number of reviews nor the star rating tracked with getting named — both came out close enough to zero to mean nothing (review count +0.021, star rating +0.140, on a scale where 1.0 would be a perfect match).

Finding 05

Do different AI answer engines recommend the same businesses?

No two AI answer engines recommend the same local businesses. Measured across 186 orthodontists in 6 markets: asked the same questions, any two engines agreed on somewhere between 35.4% and 66.0% of the businesses they named — so being named by one is no guarantee of being named by the others.

Across every market combined, each engine named a different share of the businesses measured: Perplexity named 64, Gemini named 44, Google AI Overview named 39, ChatGPT named 27, Claude named 24.

2221121922ChatGPTGeminiPerplexity
Of the 69 practices named by any of the three, all three agreed on 22.
How often two engines named the same business
Engine pairAgreed on
Gemini & Google AI Overview66.0%
Gemini & Perplexity61.2%
ChatGPT & Claude59.4%
Perplexity & Google AI Overview53.7%
Claude & Gemini51.1%
ChatGPT & Google AI Overview50.0%
Claude & Google AI Overview50.0%
ChatGPT & Gemini47.9%
ChatGPT & Perplexity35.8%
Claude & Perplexity35.4%

How much does this vary between markets?

Substantially. The share of practices no engine named ranged from 70% to 86.7% across the 6 markets measured. Every market’s own figures are published on its own page, computed from that market alone.

Per-market results — 186 businesses across 6 markets
MarketPracticesNever namedTop 3 took
Charleston, SC5286.5%75%
Ocala, FL4586.7%75%
Santa Barbara, CA3482.4%68.5%
Visalia, CA3275%85.8%
Terre Haute, IN1376.9%100%
Corvallis, OR1070%100%

How we measured it

In each of 6 markets we pulled every Orthodontics practice Google Maps returns, then asked 5 AI answer engines the same 10 patient questions and recorded which ones each engine named.

Sample
186 practices across 6 markets: Charleston, SC; Corvallis, OR; Ocala, FL; Santa Barbara, CA; Terre Haute, IN; Visalia, CA. A practice with more than one listing is counted once per market. 95 listings that share the websites of 31 organizations are counted as those organizations, because AI engines cite an organization's site rather than any individual listing.
Market selection
The 6 markets were picked before any measuring started — deliberately spread across large, medium and small cities and across the country — and every market we opened is reported here, including the ones that came back less interesting.
Collection
10 patient questions per market, held identical across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google's AI Overview. 50 answers per market, July 2026.
Visibility
Share of answers naming or citing a practice, weighted by the reach of the engine that named it.
What we will and will not publish
A combined number only goes up when it covers at least 3 markets and 150 practices, with a usable reading for at least half of them. Where markets disagree with each other, we publish the range as well as the average rather than hiding it.
Scope
One category, 6 US markets. Practices are never named. Answer engines change over time; these figures describe July 2026.

For anyone who wants the statistics

The findings above are counts, which is how most people want to read them. Here are the same relationships as correlations, across all 186 businesses.

Reputation signals vs getting named — 186 practices
What we measuredHow closely it trackedWhat that means
Google Maps rank−0.324A slight connection
Review count+0.021No connection
Star rating+0.14No real connection

Reading the middle column: 0.0 means the two things had nothing to do with each other. 1.0 would mean they moved together perfectly. A minus sign means they moved in opposite directions. Anything under about 0.2 either way is noise.

The Local AI Visibility Index — 6 markets, July 2026. Published by Moonline AEO GEO.