Skip to main content

The Local AI Visibility Index

full-mouth dental implants across 6 US markets

We measured every full-mouth dental implants practice Google Maps returns in 6 markets — 342 businesses in total — then asked 5 AI answer engines the same 10 patient questions in each one and recorded who got named.

Practices
342
Markets
6
Questions
10 per market
Engines
5
Measured
July 2026

74.3%

of the best-reviewed full-mouth dental implants practices across 6 markets were named by no AI answer engine at all.

Finding 01

How often do the best-ranked local businesses show up in AI answers?

The businesses ranked highest on Google Maps still show up in only 19.8% of AI answers. Measured across 342 full mouth dental implant specialists in 6 markets: across the best-ranked 10% by map position, an AI engine named them in 19.8% of the answers about their own category.

Ranking well clearly helps. It is also clearly not the thing that decides it — most of the best-ranked businesses across these 6 markets still never came up. And this is an average of markets that do not agree with each other: rank counted for more in the smaller markets we measured than in the larger ones.

Google Maps rank vs getting named — all 6 markets combined
Where they rank on Google MapsNamed by AIShare
The 1st third — best ranked on Maps42 of 11436.8%
The middle third14 of 11412.3%
The bottom third5 of 1144.4%

Finding 02

How much of the AI answers do a handful of businesses take?

In the average local market, three businesses take 65.6% of everything AI answer engines say. Measured across 342 full mouth dental implant specialists in 6 markets: the three most-named businesses in each market got 65.6% of all the mentions, and everyone else split what was left.

Finding 03

Are the best-reviewed local businesses named by AI answer engines?

74.3% of the best-reviewed local businesses are never named by an AI answer engine. Measured across 342 full mouth dental implant specialists in 6 markets: among the top half by Google rank, star rating and review count combined, 74.3% show up in Google Maps but were named in none of the AI answers about their own category.

Finding 04

Do Google reviews decide whether AI names a business?

Google reviews do not decide whether AI answer engines name a business. Measured across 342 full mouth dental implant specialists in 6 markets: neither the number of reviews nor the star rating tracked with getting named — both came out close enough to zero to mean nothing (review count +0.015, star rating -0.082, on a scale where 1.0 would be a perfect match).

Finding 05

Do different AI answer engines recommend the same businesses?

No two AI answer engines recommend the same local businesses. Measured across 342 full mouth dental implant specialists in 6 markets: asked the same questions, any two engines agreed on somewhere between 30.4% and 50.9% of the businesses they named — so being named by one is no guarantee of being named by the others.

Across every market combined, each engine named a different share of the businesses measured: Gemini named 95, Perplexity named 91, Google AI Overview named 68, ChatGPT named 63, Claude named 42.

How often two engines named the same business
Engine pairAgreed on
Gemini & Google AI Overview50.9%
Perplexity & Google AI Overview48.6%
Gemini & Perplexity46.5%
Claude & Google AI Overview44.7%
ChatGPT & Perplexity40.0%
ChatGPT & Gemini37.4%
ChatGPT & Google AI Overview35.1%
Claude & Gemini34.3%
ChatGPT & Claude32.9%
Claude & Perplexity30.4%

How much does this vary between markets?

Substantially. The share of practices no engine named ranged from 58.3% to 90.9% across the 6 markets measured. Every market’s own figures are published on its own page, computed from that market alone.

Per-market results — 342 businesses across 6 markets
MarketPracticesNever namedTop 3 took
Phoenix, AZ9488.3%70.3%
Philadelphia, PA7790.9%90.2%
Bend, OR5881%52.9%
Savannah, GA5874.1%39.6%
Peoria, IL3177.4%66.4%
Mansfield, OH2458.3%73.9%

How we measured it

In each of 6 markets we pulled every full-mouth dental implants practice Google Maps returns, then asked 5 AI answer engines the same 10 patient questions and recorded which ones each engine named.

Sample
342 practices across 6 markets: Bend, OR; Mansfield, OH; Peoria, IL; Philadelphia, PA; Phoenix, AZ; Savannah, GA. A practice with more than one listing is counted once per market.
Market selection
The 6 markets were picked before any measuring started — deliberately spread across large, medium and small cities and across the country — and every market we opened is reported here, including the ones that came back less interesting.
Collection
10 patient questions per market, held identical across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google's AI Overview. 50 answers per market, July 2026.
Visibility
Share of answers naming or citing a practice, weighted by the reach of the engine that named it.
What we will and will not publish
A combined number only goes up when it covers at least three markets and 150 businesses, with a usable reading for at least half of them. Where markets disagree with each other, we publish the range as well as the average rather than hiding it.
Scope
One category, 6 US markets. Practices are never named. Answer engines change over time; these figures describe July 2026.

For anyone who wants the statistics

The findings above are counts, which is how most people want to read them. Here are the same relationships as correlations, across all 342 businesses.

Reputation signals vs getting named — 342 practices
What we measuredHow closely it trackedWhat that means
Google Maps rank−0.309A slight connection
Review count+0.015No connection
Star rating−0.082No connection

Reading the middle column: 0.0 means the two things had nothing to do with each other. 1.0 would mean they moved together perfectly. A minus sign means they moved in opposite directions. Anything under about 0.2 either way is noise.

The Local AI Visibility Index — 6 markets, July 2026. Published by Moonline AEO GEO.